​A simple poll,  for CA developers to make decisions on.  It started with this thread, which was just too wordy (too much un-nutritious crap). 

So start this quick poll to show what people think about this topic.

What's the question?

Which do you prefer?  Which ones do you play?  Which one should CA focus on?

​

DarthEnderX-#6513 wrote:

What's the question?

Which do you prefer?  Which ones do you play?  Which one should CA focus on?

​My oversight. I think the question should be the third 'Which one should CA focus on?"

I have no interest in multiplayer, but I am glad it has a decent sized scene, as those guys are significantly better at giving feedback for balance than SP only players, which tends to just be "I want everything to be amazing always, and never nerf anything"

​

yanghaohit#5017 wrote:

​

DarthEnderX-#6513 wrote:

What's the question?

Which do you prefer?  Which ones do you play?  Which one should CA focus on?

​My oversight. I think the question should be the third 'Which one should CA focus on?"

Where’s the both option?

​

Sandboxhead#8494 wrote:
Being enticed to buy something because it's unbalanced is just juvenile, but apparently it's a working strategy?

Or people are buying them because the characters and units are cool, and power has nothing to do with it?

​

DarthEnderX-#6513 wrote:

​Or people are buying them because the characters and units are cool, and power has nothing to do with it?

One would certainly think so, but it seems CA thinks otherwise.

I'm actually not that bothered by problem #1 though, because I'm a SP player so if I don't like the fact that wearing bear hats suddenly gives a unit AP bolts, I can just mod it out.

I voted MP Campaign, but Im very split between that and SP

They way this poll is split up is going to lead to skewed results, virtually no-one ONLY plays multiplayer. The results will then be used by people to say 'Look, see no-one plays multiplayer, CA please don't balance for multiplayer'

Even as a single-player only player I dislike the poll for that reason.

The poll is currently at 70% SP but i'd guess the true number is even higher as i imagine most casual players (ie not forum users) would predominantly play SP only

It is also a condition that you publish the survey in the general forum area, if you publish it in the MP battles forum area, the result could be very different.

Furthermore, the option to vote "both" is missing, so this survey is useless.

CA should refrain from using more than a bare minimum of resources on a game mode that a tiny minoroty of the player base spend any significant time on

Those resources would be much better spent on bettering the campaign with either new content or AI improvement

​

Reeks#2417 wrote:

CA should refrain from using more than a bare minimum of resources on a game mode that a tiny minoroty of the player base spend any significant time on

Those resources would be much better spent on bettering the campaign with either new content or AI improvement

AI improvement would be a game changer, particularly on the campaign map. but also in battles 

Both, obviously. The only true waste of resources is further development of the RoC campaign or Mirror of Madness.

And this thread isn't valuable for CA, they've got a ton of data from every game ever played.

​

Reeks#2417 wrote:

CA should refrain from using more than a bare minimum of resources on a game mode that a tiny minoroty of the player base spend any significant time on

Those resources would be much better spent on bettering the campaign with either new content or AI improvement

No.

MP players have the same right to have improvements in their game modes as SP players.

Just because we are less does not mean that we do not have the same rights.

Singleplayer only. Always. I have never played multiplayer in TW:WH. The last TW game where I tried the mode was Shogun because of Avatar Conquest.