Sooo the 100th LL will be for Khorne?

Reply
Copied to clipboard!
3 days ago
Jun 26, 2024, 8:58:21 PM

Probably Arbaal. Happy with this decision?

I never expected the 100th LL to be very special but I thought he/she won’t be from one of the DLC races.

0Send private message
3 days ago
Jun 26, 2024, 9:02:49 PM

Depends on how you count. Who comes first, the free-LC or the DLC lord? And if the second is the answer, then who's the third lord? I guess the Orc one, because CA doesn't seem to have done much with him. Nothing about him was shown.

0Send private message
0Send private message
3 days ago
Jun 26, 2024, 11:25:56 PM

ooooor..... we could all agree that Daniel is BS and not a LL, so he doesn't count, puting us back at 99 and leaving space for someone BIG!


OR CA can do a big surprise and release 2 DLCs back to back



0Send private message
0Send private message
3 days ago
Jun 26, 2024, 11:55:38 PM

Like I said in another thread.


I wasn't expecting much for the 100th LL, but I was hoping we could get 2 FLC LL's with the upcoming DLC. One for the DLC and one as the 100th LL.

0Send private message
0Send private message
3 days ago
Jun 27, 2024, 12:06:34 AM

TBH, I’m fine with the 100th lord being a nobody, if he was a somebody and was a FLC he’d be low effort and without units. 


Mind you, they did promise some FLC LLs between now and the end of the year.

0Send private message
3 days ago
Jun 27, 2024, 12:20:31 AM

davedave1124#4773 wrote:

TBH, I’m fine with the 100th lord being a nobody, if he was a somebody and was a FLC he’d be low effort and without units. 


Mind you, they did promise some FLC LLs between now and the end of the year.

Thats actually a good point.

0Send private message
3 days ago
Jun 27, 2024, 6:02:54 AM

Jarms48#7854 wrote:

Like I said in another thread.


I wasn't expecting much for the 100th LL, but I was hoping we could get 2 FLC LL's with the upcoming DLC. One for the DLC and one as the 100th LL.

It was all the community working themselves into a tizzy that the 100th LL HAD to be a special occurrence. All CA ever did was acknowledge that some people felt that way when asked specifically on a Discord question, but never made any promises. It's been pretty amusing to observe IMO.

0Send private message
3 days ago
Jun 27, 2024, 6:13:14 AM

Depends how CA decides to count them.


It could be:

97. Skulltaker

98. Arbaal

99. Gorbad

100. Golgfag

0Send private message
3 days ago
Jun 27, 2024, 6:44:21 AM

DarthEnderX-#6513 wrote:

Depends how CA decides to count them.


It could be:

97. Skulltaker

98. Arbaal

99. Gorbad

100. Golgfag

I mean, if you see it like that, then the 100th Lord could only have been kind of "special" if he was a stand alone FLC without an accompanying DLC.

But he was never supposed to be that special:


Q: Will we get to 100 LLs or 100+ LL with the future DLC packs and FLCs? 

A: Almost certainly. We're already doing some thinking about who'll be no. 100...


And at least CA would have known who the number 100 was. 


Also in the past CA always introduced us to the DLC lords first and then to the FLC. They first made a showcase for every ToD LL and after that a content creator for the FLC. So counting should be like:


93: Tamurkhan

94: Elspeth

95: Malakai

96: Epidemius


0Send private message
3 days ago
Jun 27, 2024, 6:51:23 AM

Schub#9514 wrote:

93: Tamurkhan

94: Elspeth

95: Malakai

96: Epidemius

But those are OUR numbers, not CA's numbers.  Because CA has never numbered the LLs.


Does it make sense for them to be by reveal order?  Yes.  But that doesn't mean they are.

0Send private message
3 days ago
Jun 27, 2024, 6:58:05 AM

DarthEnderX-#6513 wrote:

Schub#9514 wrote:

93: Tamurkhan

94: Elspeth

95: Malakai

96: Epidemius

But those are OUR numbers, not CA's numbers.  Because CA has never numbered the LLs.


Does it make sense for them to be by reveal order?  Yes.  But that doesn't mean they are.

But if CA has no numbers, how should that work:

Q: Will we get to 100 LLs or 100+ LL with the future DLC packs and FLCs? 

A: Almost certainly. We're already doing some thinking about who'll be no. 100...



Only if you make a FLC after a DLC without another one. But this statement sounds not like it will be "something big".

0Send private message
0Send private message
3 days ago
Jun 27, 2024, 10:52:46 AM

Schub#9514 wrote:
But if CA has no numbers, how should that work:

However the **** CA says it works.


They can claim any of the LLs in 6.0 is the 100th LL.  Because they're all arriving in the game at the same time.


If CA says Arbaal is the 100th, he is.  If they say Golgfag is the 100th, then he is.

Updated 3 days ago.
0Send private message
3 days ago
Jun 27, 2024, 11:07:19 AM

if the next 4 lords are the ones in the dlc (ie no flc LLs in between) then for me there’s no special 100th LL. That’s fine. I’m not gonna lose sleep over it. I think it’s more a shame for CA not celebrating the milestone 

0Send private message
3 days ago
Jun 27, 2024, 11:21:27 AM

Theo91#7431 wrote:
if the next 4 lords are the ones in the dlc (ie no flc LLs in between) then for me there’s no special 100th LL.

If the 100th LL is Golgfag, that's about as special as you can get.


He's one of the most famous and recurring characters in WHFBs.  And has been around longer than pretty much any other character in the game.  I think Golgfag and Harald are the only 2 "oldhammer" characters in TWWH.

0Send private message
3 days ago
Jun 27, 2024, 11:23:48 AM
Well if they really want to promote 100 as a milestone with a special LL, they can still use the 101st LL as the "first LL above 100".


But I wasn't expecting anything with the 100th so I won't either with the 101st.
0Send private message
0Send private message
?

Click here to login

Reply
Comment