I don't, like at all.

A Grand Cathay style dragon is so missplaced in the Kislev roster it's not even funny

Reeks#2417 wrote:

I don't, like at all.

A Grand Cathay style dragon is so missplaced in the Kislev roster it's not even funny

Isn’t it the Ancient Salamander model? 

Reeks#2417 wrote:

I don't, like at all.

A Grand Cathay style dragon is so missplaced in the Kislev roster it's not even funny

I don't know why people keep saying this. It's clearly way shorter and chunkier than a cathay dragon.

It has a reasonable look of the Norsca version but without the wings.

I’m fine with it, if it’s a natural creature of Kislev then it’s close enough to Ostankya’s theme.

I like it, might actually be my favourite Kislev unit aesthetically.

I don't dislike it but it but it certainly wasn't on my bingo card.

I think its a nice addition with nice future implications. Renaming the Norscan one to a Chaos Frost Dragon opens up the possibility for Kislev to recieve an uncorrupted Frost/Ice Dragon. Which do exist in the lore, especially in the Mountains of Mourn.

I do like it. It is a nice addition that fits the theme. The take GW and CA are taking on new Kislev is great. I am all for exanding the lore and going new ways instead of the conservative everything-has-to-be-as-20-years-ago approach.

ElStaufo#4038 wrote:

I do like it. It is a nice addition that fits the theme. The take GW and CA are taking on new Kislev is great. I am all for exanding the lore and going new ways instead of the conservative everything-has-to-be-as-20-years-ago approach.

Sure, rewrting Kislev to be utterly bland internally is absolutely the right way to go. Lets throw away a plethora of perfectly viable lore in favour of writing up new stuff that in many cases don't make any sense at all.

TheWattman#7460 wrote:

I think its a nice addition with nice future implications. Renaming the Norscan one to a Chaos Frost Dragon opens up the possibility for Kislev to recieve an uncorrupted Frost/Ice Dragon. Which do exist in the lore, especially in the Mountains of Mourn.

Dragons exist all over.

We mostly hear about them terrorising the lands of men, who in turn do their best to slay them.

It's better than the dumb Elemental Bear that's for sure.

TheWattman#7460 wrote:

ElStaufo#4038 wrote:

I do like it. It is a nice addition that fits the theme. The take GW and CA are taking on new Kislev is great. I am all for exanding the lore and going new ways instead of the conservative everything-has-to-be-as-20-years-ago approach.

Sure, rewrting Kislev to be utterly bland internally is absolutely the right way to go. Lets throw away a plethora of perfectly viable lore in favour of writing up new stuff that in many cases don't make any sense at all.

Some like the museum version others like to look ahead. Both is fine, neither is objectivley right or wrong. 

Sorry, to hear, it did not go how you liked it.

frost wyrm makes no sense, and looks awful. Kislev needed frostfiends as mounts and beasts, or giant owls 

Sabor444#1932 wrote:

Reeks#2417 wrote:

I don't, like at all.

A Grand Cathay style dragon is so missplaced in the Kislev roster it's not even funny

I don't know why people keep saying this. It's clearly way shorter and chunkier than a cathay dragon.

Still looks like a chinese dragon

It's grossly out of place

CA went for a cheep option with this pseudo cathay abomination instead of creating something original to save cash, it's pretty obvious.

Reeks#2417 wrote:

Still looks like a chinese dragon

I mean, Slavic depictions of dragons do sometimes share similarities with Chinese ones.

In the lands of ice and snow, I think having a dragon made of ice is really cool. At least it is a native Kislev creature, and from the look of it, not too overpowered being a mid tier unit. It also shows us the uncorrupted version of the Norscan ones. And for those saying it looks Chinese, take a look at the Welsh dragon used on the flag, this reminds me of that but without wings.