I know they didn't have one on TT, but it really feels like they should.

Blue Scribes gets a Disc.  Epidemius gets a Palanquin.  Skulltaker gets a Blood Throne.  It's only fair Masque gets a mount option as well.

And the Seeker Chariot is the obvious choice, because a chariot allows them to be mounted, while still being able to perform their signature dancing.

Considering Dechala won’t likely have a mount (and neither Sigvald or Azazel), it would really be Slaanesh’s only opportunity for a mounted character. Not to mention regular heralds get mounts. Seems like a perfect fit.

+1

​

Passthechips#4366 wrote:

Considering Dechala won’t likely have a mount (and neither Sigvald or Azazel), it would really be Slaanesh’s only opportunity for a mounted character. Not to mention regular heralds get mounts. Seems like a perfect fit.

+1

Except that she can't really fulfill her whole dance fantasy on a mount !

I'm not necessarily against it, but it should be noted that two of your examples can only exist on their mounts just cuz.

They don't get a mount option as it's not even an option.

Tiloki9#2502 wrote:

​

Passthechips#4366 wrote:

Considering Dechala won’t likely have a mount (and neither Sigvald or Azazel), it would really be Slaanesh’s only opportunity for a mounted character. Not to mention regular heralds get mounts. Seems like a perfect fit.

+1

Except that she can't really fulfill her whole dance fantasy on a mount !

Technically possible.

Nah just give her some bespoke dancing animations and sync kill moves. 

​

DarthEnderX-#6513 wrote:

​

Tiloki9#2502 wrote:
Except that she can't really fulfill her whole dance fantasy on a mount !

You can on a chariot.  Especially a Seeker Chariot, which basically has a dance platform.

You could play DDR up there.

The question is why would anyone even use her on a chariot instead of on foot? Chariot LLs are horrible. 

The dancing would, presumably, be area of effect buffs so putting her on a chariot would enable her to dance quickly around the battlefield (through enemy units if necessary) to support her troops. I'm not against the idea 

Nah, it's time to stop with the mounts. CA knows that they overdid it with mounts in this game and I agree with the assement that it would be to the game's benefit to get rid of most of them. I just hope that they actually take the time to fix this. We need fewer mounts in the game, not more.

​

BorgerBoar#2786 wrote:

Nah, it's time to stop with the mounts. CA knows that they overdid it with mounts in this game and I agree with the assement that it would be to the game's benefit to get rid of most of them. I just hope that they actually take the time to fix this. We need fewer mounts in the game, not more.

This. Foot LLs for the win. 

​

Captain_Rex#1635 wrote:

The question is why would anyone even use her on a chariot instead of on foot? Chariot LLs are horrible. 

Chariots mounts really aren't bad at all, they are infantry blender but they do require micro.

My boy Grom is great on his charriot!

I hope Masque gets deleted from WHFB. 

Anyway. +1. 

​

MiniaAr#5798 wrote:

My boy Grom is great on his charriot!

Because he is a chariot character like Settra. 

Masque is not. Give her a Seeker and that’s it. 

​

Captain_Rex#1635 wrote:
The question is why would anyone even use her on a chariot instead of on foot? Chariot LLs are horrible. 

Chariots got a decent bit better in 6.0.

DrJammat#8325 wrote:
The dancing would, presumably, be area of effect buffs so putting her on a chariot would enable her to dance quickly around the battlefield (through enemy units if necessary) to support her troops. I'm not against the idea

Well, in TT, her dances debuffed enemies, rather than buffed allies.  But the benefit is the same.  Quickly repositioning that aura as needed.

BorgerBoar#2786 wrote:
CA knows that they overdid it with mounts in this game

Says who?

BorgerBoar#2786 wrote:
We need fewer mounts in the game, not more.

Slaanesh has zero mounted LLs so far.

Captain_Rex#1635 wrote:
Give her a Seeker and that’s it. 

...she can't dance on a Seeker.

​

DarthEnderX-#6513 wrote:

Says who?

Says CA.

​

Neodeinos#5871 wrote:
Says CA.

When?

​

DarthEnderX-#6513 wrote:

​

Neodeinos#5871 wrote:
Says CA.

When?

I don't recall where this is from as there is a ton of information scattered across various interviews on Youtube/Twitch, Discord Q&A, Reddit AMA but at one point they did say they went overboard with some of the mount options in Warhammer 2 and said it was a mistake. I doubt this means they can't or won't add new options if they are reasonable however, I just wouldn't expect retarded shit that are nonsensical like the stupid Teclis' Parrot. The Seeker Chariot for the Masque sounds reasonable enough to realistically happen imo.

​

Neodeinos#5871 wrote:
I don't recall where this is from as there is a ton of information scattered across various interviews on Youtube/Twitch, Discord Q&A, Reddit AMA but at one point they did say they went overboard with some of the mount options in Warhammer 2 and said it was a mistake. I doubt this means they can't or won't add new options if they are reasonable however, I just wouldn't expect retarded shit that are nonsensical like the stupid Teclis' Parrot. The Seeker Chariot for the Masque sounds reasonable enough to realistically happen imo.

+1