2 and 3 would be fine for me.

I hate Greasus' model but i could probably make my peace with it if their campaign was really fun

movable Camps is the most importing thing.

Then Skrag moved back to the MoM. 

Then Greasus getting a Palanquin mount. 

They need a complete rework, pretty much everything about their campaign mechanics needs looking at.

It'll be really disappointing if Greasus doesn't have his wheelchair binned.

​

Theo91#7431 wrote:
I hate Greasus' model but i could probably make my peace with it if their campaign was really fun

Same but will 

hurt my soul for long time 

New Greasus mount.  Moveable camps.

Full rework (Im not picky) and Ghark later down the line.

Way better camps. Movable (even if they are slow), with spécial gimmicks, like garrisons, a dedicated lord (giving bonuses when he level UP, somehow like a governor), etc. 

More great/big names 

Mercenary contracts finally interesting

Better tech tree 

The possibility to get a real kingdom in the MoM with a few T5 settlements

I don't need much personally, slowly movable camps and better skill trees for Skrag and Greasus.

​

Neodeinos#5871 wrote:

I don't need much personally, slowly movable camps and better skill trees for Skrag and Greasus.

I remember you having a sound idea for the Ogres with a Migration mechanics.

New mount for Greasus. It was one thing when they were going on and on how they couldn't do a palenquin but they literally gave one to Nurgle at the same time. It was the biggest flag ever to show someone a race is not core but a second notion at the time. >D

Greasus needs greasing. Camps need greasing.

​- Movable camps

- A better economy 

- Unique campaigns for Greasus and Skrag.
- Proper LL skill trees that they don't have today. 
- LLs should be able to have multiple Big Names.  
- A cost reduction for many of the lore of the great maw spells. 
- The Lore of Heavens and Death as an FLC.

- More unique buildings 

Movable camps

Agreed with OP. Would also like to see more variation with Maneater units but if we get at least those 3 points mentioned in OP I'll be happy.

​

NickCageStoleMyFace#5594 wrote:

​

Reeks#2417 wrote:

1: Greasus getting another mount option or even be available unmounted

Nope on the unmounted, completely betrays his character if he's just walking around.

Better than what he got now

​

Reeks#2417 wrote:

​

NickCageStoleMyFace#5594 wrote:

​

Reeks#2417 wrote:

1: Greasus getting another mount option or even be available unmounted

Nope on the unmounted, completely betrays his character if he's just walking around.

Better than what he got now

It is entirely possible for both options to be terrible. The very appeal of greasus particularly as a figure on the TT was his damned mount. Ridiculous, over the top, an Ogre of particularly opulence.

CA really missed the mark here.

I am expecting Golgfag to be good regardless - CA have had the time to refine his campaign.

Worthwhile would see decent and varied mechanics for Skrag and Greasus making those campaigns challenging but rewarding. As it stands there is little point owning the OK race pack - I hope CA will change that.

Secretly I am hoping for an additional FLC Ogre LL that we knew nothing about - they are hitting 100 LLs with this release after all.