Sorry, main thing I'm here for in any faction DLC is new units.

for WH2, I had different textures for the different lore of magic

I am afraid that you seem to have become a bit confused with IPs. This isn't TW:W, you have confused it with:

swampselkie#7748 wrote:

I'm still hoping for more forest spirit units to make spirit-only armies more viable and interesting. Given that the strangleroot attack hasn't really been implemented for treemen, a Strangleroot Treeman variant could make for a decent short-range option. While spites are in game as a mechanic, I'd love to see Greater Spites as a swarm-type unit. Naiads would be a good addition for both WE and Bretonnia (and as we now have one Incarnate Elemental in the game, the Incarnate Elemental of Life could work here). There's a lot of room for interpretation within the forest spirit lore, if CA decide to get creative.

More arrow-types would be welcome, and I agree with those who have suggested that the existing ammunition variants should be reconceptualised via an iteration of the scrap mechanic (with the option to toggle different ammunition types against the unit in multiplayer, for those who care about such things).

I like the smaller treants that AoS has with either swords or bows. Could be a decent monstrous infantry forest spirit similar to ushabti and ushabti greatbows. Though I'm not sure if they ar lorefully exclusive to AoS (Meaning they only exist due to something that occurred in AoS)

MODIDDLY1#9212 wrote:

swampselkie#7748 wrote:

I'm still hoping for more forest spirit units to make spirit-only armies more viable and interesting. Given that the strangleroot attack hasn't really been implemented for treemen, a Strangleroot Treeman variant could make for a decent short-range option. While spites are in game as a mechanic, I'd love to see Greater Spites as a swarm-type unit. Naiads would be a good addition for both WE and Bretonnia (and as we now have one Incarnate Elemental in the game, the Incarnate Elemental of Life could work here). There's a lot of room for interpretation within the forest spirit lore, if CA decide to get creative.

More arrow-types would be welcome, and I agree with those who have suggested that the existing ammunition variants should be reconceptualised via an iteration of the scrap mechanic (with the option to toggle different ammunition types against the unit in multiplayer, for those who care about such things).

I like the smaller treants that AoS has with either swords or bows. Could be a decent monstrous infantry forest spirit similar to ushabti and ushabti greatbows. Though I'm not sure if they ar lorefully exclusive to AoS (Meaning they only exist due to something that occurred in AoS)

Would still love to know what this guy was from the 8th edition rulebook:  

I'd like Laurelorn Forest to be playable.

So we add remaning lore of magic for both wood elves and dark elves.

Draculasaurus#4914 wrote:

MODIDDLY1#9212 wrote:

swampselkie#7748 wrote:

I'm still hoping for more forest spirit units to make spirit-only armies more viable and interesting. Given that the strangleroot attack hasn't really been implemented for treemen, a Strangleroot Treeman variant could make for a decent short-range option. While spites are in game as a mechanic, I'd love to see Greater Spites as a swarm-type unit. Naiads would be a good addition for both WE and Bretonnia (and as we now have one Incarnate Elemental in the game, the Incarnate Elemental of Life could work here). There's a lot of room for interpretation within the forest spirit lore, if CA decide to get creative.

More arrow-types would be welcome, and I agree with those who have suggested that the existing ammunition variants should be reconceptualised via an iteration of the scrap mechanic (with the option to toggle different ammunition types against the unit in multiplayer, for those who care about such things).

I like the smaller treants that AoS has with either swords or bows. Could be a decent monstrous infantry forest spirit similar to ushabti and ushabti greatbows. Though I'm not sure if they ar lorefully exclusive to AoS (Meaning they only exist due to something that occurred in AoS)

Would still love to know what this guy was from the 8th edition rulebook:  

I suspect the mentioned dragon is:

As for dream beings, I'm unaware of their existence outside the text in question.

In case the inserted image is wrong and the intended one is this one*:

The art was on the cover of 6ED WE AB, that's when this miniature of a Treeman came out:

In regards to the thread's main topic, Spellweavers couldn't mount dragons on TT.

Also, I would prefer one more DLC over FLC.

*I remember it being discussed in years past.

Animal Packs and beasmaster

Glade Chariot

swampselkie#7748 wrote:

I'm still hoping for more forest spirit units to make spirit-only armies more viable and interesting. Given that the strangleroot attack hasn't really been implemented for treemen, a Strangleroot Treeman variant could make for a decent short-range option. While spites are in game as a mechanic, I'd love to see Greater Spites as a swarm-type unit. Naiads would be a good addition for both WE and Bretonnia (and as we now have one Incarnate Elemental in the game, the Incarnate Elemental of Life could work here). There's a lot of room for interpretation within the forest spirit lore, if CA decide to get creative.

More arrow-types would be welcome, and I agree with those who have suggested that the existing ammunition variants should be reconceptualised via an iteration of the scrap mechanic (with the option to toggle different ammunition types against the unit in multiplayer, for those who care about such things).

For this reason I thought/hoped that the incarnate of beasts would be available to the we as well. it fits the animalistic spirits of athel loren which we sadly never got to see.

I just hope that CA will eventually add Naieth the Prophetess and Araloth as Wood Elves legendary lords. If Wood Elves really need another legendary hero, there's always Scarloc.

Labria#2848 wrote:

I just hope that CA will eventually add Naieth the Prophetess and Araloth as Wood Elves legendary lords. If Wood Elves really need another legendary hero, there's always Scarloc.

 

I would personally like to get Amadri as a LL/LH as well.

mecanojavi99#6562 wrote:

Labria#2848 wrote:

I just hope that CA will eventually add Naieth the Prophetess and Araloth as Wood Elves legendary lords. If Wood Elves really need another legendary hero, there's always Scarloc.

 

I would personally like to get Amadri as a LL/LH as well.

He's the Treekin that still retains his memories right? With a Slaanesh rivalry he'd be good too. Maybe if CA ever returns to FLC lords

MODIDDLY1#9212 wrote:

swampselkie#7748 wrote:

I'm still hoping for more forest spirit units to make spirit-only armies more viable and interesting. Given that the strangleroot attack hasn't really been implemented for treemen, a Strangleroot Treeman variant could make for a decent short-range option. While spites are in game as a mechanic, I'd love to see Greater Spites as a swarm-type unit. Naiads would be a good addition for both WE and Bretonnia (and as we now have one Incarnate Elemental in the game, the Incarnate Elemental of Life could work here). There's a lot of room for interpretation within the forest spirit lore, if CA decide to get creative.

More arrow-types would be welcome, and I agree with those who have suggested that the existing ammunition variants should be reconceptualised via an iteration of the scrap mechanic (with the option to toggle different ammunition types against the unit in multiplayer, for those who care about such things).

I like the smaller treants that AoS has with either swords or bows. Could be a decent monstrous infantry forest spirit similar to ushabti and ushabti greatbows. Though I'm not sure if they ar lorefully exclusive to AoS (Meaning they only exist due to something that occurred in AoS)

I also like the half elf half tree guys, they look like something that could happen if you take a nap on the wrong tree in Athel loren.

Draculasaurus#4914 wrote:

Sorry, main thing I'm here for in any faction DLC is new units.

would you like to go back and read the name of the thread ;) 

I don't like the thought of a second anti-large AP hero for Wood Elves. It's even worse if they're unable to ride a mount.