I want to preface this by saying that I am not looking to be negative, but I want CA to actually try to do something right for their fanbase that's literally keeping the lights on for their studio right now single-handedly.  

We are officially at the end of the first half of the year, and things couldn't be duller than they are for Total War.  

Although the year started strong with the much-needed Kislev rework, Creative Assembly has failed to instill any confidence about the future of its games.  

The marketing for the upcoming DLC has stagnated since the first month of Slaanesh teases, and we are still waiting for any updates regarding 6.2 and what's next for the game as a whole. We need CA to actually engage with their own game; where are the livestreams of the CA team playing their games? Or actual chats with the community?  

Please, CA, maintain consistent communication with the community and don't only show up in the most dire of circumstances. 

the ironic thing is, when you’ve bought 3 main games, and over a dozen DLCs for a game, it discourages you from buying other Total War games. WH40k isn’t particularly appealing to me as on release, we’ll have 4 or 5 factions with maybe 10 LLs, whereas I can play a TWWH campaign which has far more detail and immersion instead.  I’m shocked that CA are willing to slowly kill off the golden goose 

​

Theo91#7431 wrote:

the ironic thing is, when you’ve bought 3 main games, and over a dozen DLCs for a game, it discourages you from buying other Total War games. WH40k isn’t particularly appealing to me as on release, we’ll have 4 or 5 factions with maybe 10 LLs, whereas I can play a TWWH campaign which has far more detail and immersion instead.  I’m shocked that CA are willing to slowly kill off the golden goose 

Don't be hyperbolic, they are doing no such thing.

This game didn't even had one good year of support and content. It struggles since launch.

If CA will treat WH3 badly, I defnitely won't buy WH40 k or other titles, but thats just my opinion.

​

Sagez#6761 wrote:

This game didn't even had one good year of support and content. It struggles since launch.

If CA will treat WH3 badly, I defnitely won't buy WH40 k or other titles, but thats just my opinion.

don’t worry, I knew it was just your opinion by the fact that you wrote it. I didn’t assume that you were forcing your idiosyncrasies on everyone via your comment on a forum lol

CA definitely needs to apply more resources to this title. 

​

Theo91#7431 wrote:

​

Sagez#6761 wrote:

This game didn't even had one good year of support and content. It struggles since launch.

If CA will treat WH3 badly, I defnitely won't buy WH40 k or other titles, but thats just my opinion.

don’t worry, I knew it was just your opinion by the fact that you wrote it. I didn’t assume that you were forcing your idiosyncrasies on everyone via your comment on a forum lol

haha ok. guess that's too much forum for me.

​

Sagez#6761 wrote:

This game didn't even had one good year of support and content. It struggles since launch.

If CA will treat WH3 badly, I defnitely won't buy WH40 k or other titles, but thats just my opinion.

Exactly this! Even in the best years when ToD and Chorfs got released something shity happened

If we had 2 teams working on a dlc the December one could be possible - but that's not the case.

​

SerPus#7395 wrote:

TheWattman#7460 wrote:
They got cut a LL from the standard formula.

Meh. It's not like Chaos Dwarfs had anyone else to add. 

Either a lore character or an OC like Cylostra. Remember all the talk about a Bull Centaur?

Who else is already super excited for the Sayl animation video?  

​

TheWattman#7460 wrote:
Either a lore character or an OC like Cylostra.

According to CA, creating Cylostra was really hard. I doubt that she was played enough to justify resources that CA wasted on her. 

TheWattman#7460 wrote:
Remember all the talk about a Bull Centaur?

There was no talk about any Bull Centaurs from CA, except when they said that Shar'tor is an AoS character. 

​

SerPus#7395 wrote:

There was no talk about any Bull Centaurs from CA, except when they said that Shar'tor is an AoS character. 

I meant from the community. Everyone, and I do mean everyone, was expecting 4 LLs and most pinned that down to a Bull Centaur.

I wish that would've been enough to create a SoC-like riot so that we could've gotten reinforcements like with SoC 2.0. But Chaos Dwarfs came out too shiny and were too anticipated for that to happen.

Even still after CA's efforts to rectify the past, we are still, in total, owed 3 LLs for all of the missed oppertunities. A Chaos Dwarf, a Kislevite and a Tzeentchian. And that is in addition to whatever future additions they had planned for those races beforehand.

​

TheWattman#7460 wrote:

​

SerPus#7395 wrote:

There was no talk about any Bull Centaurs from CA, except when they said that Shar'tor is an AoS character. 

I meant from the community. Everyone, and I do mean everyone, was expecting 4 LLs and most pinned that down to a Bull Centaur.

I wish that would've been enough to create a SoC-like riot so that we could've gotten reinforcements like with SoC 2.0. But Chaos Dwarfs came out too shiny and were too anticipated for that to happen.

Even still after CA's efforts to rectify the past, we are still, in total, owed 3 LLs for all of the missed oppertunities. A Chaos Dwarf, a Kislevite and a Tzeentchian. And that is in addition to whatever future additions they had planned for those races beforehand.

Couldn't agree more. People tend to forget easily, and that's a huge bummer.